
- With Mayo Clinic nutritionists
Jennifer Nelson, M.S., R.D. and Katherine Zeratsky, R.D.
read biographyclose windowBiography of
Jennifer Nelson, M.S., R.D. and Katherine Zeratsky, R.D.
Katherine Zeratsky and Jennifer Nelson
Jennifer K. Nelson, M.S., R.D., L.D., C.N.S.D.
Jennifer Nelson is your link to a better diet. As specialty editor of the Food & Nutrition Center, she plays a vital role in bringing you healthy recipes and meal planning."Nutrition is one way people have direct control over the quality of their lives," she says. "I hope to translate the science of nutrition into ways that people can select and prepare great-tasting foods that help maintain health and treat disease."
A St. Paul, Minn., native, she is certified by the National Board of Nutrition Support Certification, has been with Mayo Clinic since 1978, and is director of clinical dietetics and an associate professor of nutrition at Mayo Clinic College of Medicine.
She leads clinical nutrition efforts for a staff of more than 50 clinical dietitians and nine dietetic technicians and oversees staffing, strategic and financial planning, and quality improvement. Nelson was co-editor of the James Beard Foundation Award-winning "The New Mayo Clinic Cookbook." She has been a contributing author to and reviewer of many Mayo Clinic books, including "Mayo Clinic Healthy Weight for EveryBody," "The Mayo Clinic Family Health Book" and "The Mayo Clinic/Williams Sonoma Cookbook." She contributes to the strategic direction of the Food & Nutrition Center, which includes creating recipes and menus, reviewing nutrition content of various articles, and answering nutrition questions posed to Ask a Specialist.
Katherine Zeratsky, R.D., L.D.
As a specialty editor for the Food & Nutrition Center, Katherine Zeratsky helps you sort through the facts and figures, the fads and the hype to learn more about nutrition and diet.A Marinette, Wis., native, she is certified in dietetics by the state of Minnesota and the American Dietetic Association. She has been with Mayo Clinic since 1999.
She is active in nutrition-related curriculum and course development in pediatrics at Mayo Clinic Rochester and nutrition education related to the physiology and recommended intakes for premature infants.
Other areas of interest include breast milk and formula safety, neonatal feeding, and nutrition for breast-feeding mothers.
She graduated from the University of Wisconsin-Madison, served a dietetic internship at the University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, and worked as a registered dietitian and health risk counselor at ThedaCare of Appleton, Wis., before joining the Mayo Clinic staff.
Latest entries
- Healthy eating habits
Nov. 13, 2009
- Healthy holiday eating
Nov. 7, 2009
- Diet and immunity
Oct. 31, 2009
- Curb the candy binge
Oct. 28, 2009
- Menu planning
Oct. 24, 2009
Mayo Clinic Health Manager
Get free personalized health guidance for you and your family.
Get StartedNutrition-wise blog
-
June 4, 2008
Limit acrylamide in diet
By Jennifer Nelson, M.S., R.D. and Katherine Zeratsky, R.D.
Last week, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) posted new information about acrylamide in food and ways that we can reduce our intake of it. Yikes — has another strange chemical found its way into our foods? Apparently not. Read on.
In 2002, researchers in Sweden found the chemical acrylamide in a variety of carbohydrate-rich foods that are fried or baked at high temperatures. In large doses, this chemical has caused cancer in laboratory animals.
In response to concerns about the potential risk, the FDA began to analyze a variety of U.S. food products for acrylamide. Here's some of what they've found so far:
- Acrylamide forms from sugars and an amino acid (asparagine — a building block of protein) found naturally in foods that are fried, roasted or baked. This chemical is more likely to increase the longer foods are cooked with these methods, and the higher the temperature. Boiling or steaming of the same foods do not typically result in acrylamide formation.
- Plant foods such as potatoes, grain products (breads and breakfast cereals, cookies), and coffee are mentioned in the FDA release. Various forms of these foods are typically fried, baked or roasted. They do point out that acrylamide is not typically found in raw plant-based foods, dairy, animal foods (poultry, meat) or seafood.
Hmm ... it seems to me that mankind has been baking and frying foods at high temperatures for a long time. And haven't plant foods including grains, potatoes and coffee been staples? What to do?
The FDA discusses specific foods that are larger sources of acrylamide: French fries, potato chips, breakfast cereals, cookies, toast, and coffee. They do not recommend eliminating these foods from the diet. But, they've come up with some suggestions for a few of these items — namely potatoes, bread and coffee.
For potatoes, boiling or microwaving produces no acrylamide. Frying leads to highest acrylamide formation followed by roasting, then by baking. The darker the potato, the more acrylamide — so avoid cooking until dark brown. They have found that slicing potatoes and soaking them for 30 minutes before frying or roasting reduces acrylamide formation. Interestingly, storing potatoes in the refrigerator can increase formation of acrylamide during cooking.
For bread, if you toast it, toast to a light brown color and avoid "very brown areas."
For coffee, the FDA scientists have not found good ways to reduce acrylamide formation since the beans are roasted before brewing. (I hope that these scientists are working hard on this!)
My take? This acrylamide issue is something that will stay on my radar. There seems to be a commitment to continue research on this. From a practical standpoint I agree with the FDA — it's too early to eliminate a whole class of food (grain products), potatoes, and coffee from my diet. There are a few simple things I can do however.
I'll choose less processed cereals, and ones that I can cook (like oatmeal) more often. Toast — light brown. I'll continue to limit those French fries and chips (and entirely stop eating the brown crunchy ones). More often I'll boil or microwave the spuds and definitely take those taters out of the fridge (store them in a cool dark place). Maybe a lighter roast coffee.
It seems like almost every day more and more alerts like this come out. I'm reassured that they seem to reinforce similar messages: vary the diet, eat fewer highly processed foods, emphasize plant foods.
Thoughts? Confused by these food alerts? I'd like to hear your take.
15 comments posted
June 10, 2009 2:53 p.m.
What can you eat?
- TMC
April 7, 2009 10:14 a.m.
I'd like to see some quantification -- what level of acrylamide has a potential risk, and what levels are present in the foods mentioned
- Art
October 10, 2008 2:27 p.m.
I'm curious to know why it is that if there is concerns and reason for caution, why such food label requirements do not contain such information as with say saturated fats? I'm aware there are certain food labs that do offer the testing, but is there a way or a means for consumers to do this themselves?
- Bentley
September 16, 2008 5:36 a.m.
i dont think these foods should be banned if they are eaten in moderation.If they are wanting to ban foods containing acrylamide most foods contain acrylamide then most foods would be banned and how much is too much. meaning what is the maximum intake of acrylamide in humans.
- Adey
July 7, 2008 11:29 a.m.
Jay, here is a link to the FDA information: http://www.cfsan.fda.gov/~dms/cfsup182.html
- MayoClinic.com staff
June 30, 2008 3:02 p.m.
This is really interesting! Of course, most people aren't going to give up coffee and fried foods even if it causes cancer or something. Where is the information released from the FDA posted? I haven't seen anything, but I'd really like to learn more on this!
- Jay Saneltek
June 20, 2008 9:07 a.m.
Information given by someone else doing the research is appreciated! We do well to listen and take heed to things that can produce a longer life - if we would just take the time to choose everything in moderation we would be much better off anyway - how hard is that? Thank you for the alert and info! I'm grateful
- Mary Ellen
June 17, 2008 9:00 p.m.
Dark, folded potato chips! Toasted bagels! Man, am I going to have trouble with this! But I know what's good for me and I will try my best!!
- Ellen
June 16, 2008 5:01 p.m.
What about topical products that contain acrylamide such as, foot powders and antifungals? Do they have the same potential risk for causing cancer?
- Megan
June 11, 2008 8:41 a.m.
This simply muddies the water for the general public and I agree with SG - most people will be more confused and keep on doing what they're doing without making any healthful changes. As for me in my clinical practice, I'm going to keep on encouraging small changes to increase vegetable, fruit and grain intake with less processed food. In the long run, that's where I believe we'll make the most difference.
- Elaine, R.D., L.D.
June 11, 2008 8:39 a.m.
Sounds like the mainstay should be what's been argued for years -- moderation in all things. Ok, so I can eliminate or seriously cut down on these categories: French fries, potato chips, breakfast cereals and cookies, maybe even toast. Probably should. But the FDA better stay away from my coffee or they're going to have a mini-revolt on their hands, not unlike when certain dermatologists recommended 10 minutes or less of sun a day. (No, I don't sunbathe. I do, however garden and enjoy walking outdoors, although I don't do either in the heat of a summer day. In any case, sunscreens are not practical for someone who sweats buckets -- nothing dewy about me. Ever had sunscreen run into your eyes?) I've often wondered if folks who "translate" scientific research into everyday language don't sometimes overstate or even misstate the findings. Or, heaven help us, pick-and-choose or slant the findings to bolster some money-making endeavor, as drug companies seem to be doing more and more of these days.
- Bensu
June 10, 2008 4:06 p.m.
Most people ignore information like this because they are too concerned with paying the bills, keeping their job and putting reasonably nutritious and affordable food on the table. Results of nutritional studies often vary widely from year to year or even month to month, so I try to keep the easy-to-implement, sensible conclusions in mind and not make radical changes with the rest. Right now we are hearing that adequate vitamin D levels (from sunlight) may be one of the best ways to prevent cancer and other ailments. What to do, in light of the historic emphasis against sun exposure? A healthy diet with dairy products and a few minutes (15, 20, 25?) daily in the sun? Easy for some, difficult for others. Again, I think most people will throw their hands up and do what they please because much of the advice is impractical even if sound.
- SG
June 10, 2008 3:48 p.m.
Appreciate the info. The suggested changes in diet are reasonable and easy. Would like to have a pointer to the studies themselves - or more complete info re: the dangers.
- Catherine
June 6, 2008 2:27 p.m.
I've had cancer; it's not fun.
- Natasha
June 6, 2008 8:17 a.m.
I'll chance cancer... I like burnt things too much.
- Kelly
15 comments posted