• image.alt
  • With Mayo Clinic behavioral counselor

    Jennifer A. Kern, M.S., C.T.T.S.

    read biography

Mayo Clinic Health Manager

Get free personalized health guidance for you and your family.

Get Started

Free

E-Newsletter

Subscribe to receive the latest updates on health topics. About our newsletters

  • Housecall
  • Alzheimer's caregiving
  • Living with cancer
  • Quit smoking blog

  • March 24, 2009

    Thirdhand smoke another danger

    By Jennifer A. Kern, M.S., C.T.T.S.

30 comments posted

Most people realize that secondhand smoke is harmful, especially to children and those with chronic health problems such as heart disease and lung disease. This has led to smoking bans and clean indoor air policies. Research is now beginning to show another concern.

"Thirdhand smoke" is the term given to the residual of tobacco smoke contamination that settles into the environment and stays there even after a cigarette has been extinguished. The chemical particles resulting from the burning of tobacco, including tar and nicotine, linger on clothes, hair, upholstery, drapes etc., long after the smoke has cleared from the air.

These particles are formed from more than 200 poisonous gases, many of which are cancer causing, such as cyanide, ammonia, arsenic, and polonium-210 (which is radioactive.) These chemicals are deposited on surface areas and over time can be released back into the air.

New research has found that the residuals of tobacco smoke stay in the lungs after a smoker takes the last puff of a cigarette. It can take up to 2-3 minutes before they stop exhaling the toxic products of combustion. This expelled air may also contribute to secondhand tobacco smoke and to the residual of tobacco particles that can settle in places considered smoke-free.

Most people are aware of the negative effects of visible smoke and make efforts to control the amount that non-smokers are exposed to. We are now learning that tobacco toxins can remain in the environment as thirdhand smoke long after the smoking period is over. Children seem to be at greatest risk of being affected as they inhale these particles from clothes, rugs, draperies etc.

Making the home and car totally smoke-free is the best way to protect those you love. Also, waiting 2-3 minutes after finishing a cigarette to have contact with children or return to smoke-free areas is likely to be beneficial.

In my counseling experience, I've had people ask me whether they need to clean their house or car after quitting smoking. The answer is a very strong "Yes!" Once you make the commitment to becoming smoke-free, have your car detailed and give your house a good, thorough cleaning to get rid of thirdhand smoke. By doing so, you not only protect yourself and your loved ones from the harmful remnants of your former tobacco-controlled life, but you also deepen your resolve to remain a non-smoker for good.

30 comments posted

blog index
  • March 24, 2009 6:45 p.m.

    Katharine G, what "fact"? I'll now ask you too... Please cite a study that concludes a risk exists. Please note this article, which we are debating, is not about primary smoking. So your gratuitous opinion meant to belittle smokers would be considered diversionary. Please stick to the topic.

    - Audrey Silk

  • March 24, 2009 1:03 p.m.

    No Pete, what is extreme and irrational is you getting upset about a fact as important as this. I do not care to be exposed to such toxins, even though I am on a daily basis just by the simple air we breathe. I completely understand that smoking is the hardest drug to quit, even more difficult then quitting heroine, however, it all comes down to counting the cost. Take care Pete.

    - Katharine G

  • March 24, 2009 8:36 a.m.

    I QUIT SMOKING IN 1994 BUT MY HUSBAND IS A CHAIN SMOKER. I KNOW THAT THERE IS SOMETHING TO 3RD HAND SMOKE BECAUSE WHEN I WASHED MY WALLS RECENTLY A STREAM OF TEA COLORED WATER RAN DOWN THE WALL. IT WAS NICOTINE/TOBACCO RESIDUAL. THE WALLS PRIOR TO WASHING THEM DID NOT LOOK DISCOLORED IN ANY WAY. IT MADE ME WONDER JUST WHAT HIS LUNGS AS A SMOKER AND MY LUNGS DUE TO SECOND AND NOW 3RD HAND SMOKE MUST LOOK LIKE!

    - D.WILLIAMS

  • March 24, 2009 6:58 a.m.

    Why not just shoot all smokers. In place of that, ban them from all public places because they smell like smoke. Enough already. I agree no one should smoke! However, reactions towards smokers and smoke have become extreme and irrational.

    - pete

  • March 24, 2009 5:18 a.m.

    Please cite a study (not the survey asking people their beliefs on "thirdhand smoke" that started all this) that has found a conclusive (or of any meaningful) risk is posed.

    - Audrey Silk

Post a comment
Previous page

Text Size: smaller largerlarger