• image.alt
  • With Mayo Clinic nutritionists

    Jennifer Nelson, M.S., R.D. and Katherine Zeratsky, R.D.

    read biography

Mayo Clinic Health Manager

Get free personalized health guidance for you and your family.

Get Started

Free

E-Newsletter

Subscribe to receive the latest updates on health topics. About our newsletters

  • Housecall
  • Alzheimer's caregiving
  • Living with cancer
  • Nutrition-wise blog

  • Sept. 26, 2009

    Protecting our food supply protects our health

    By Jennifer Nelson, M.S., R.D. and Katherine Zeratsky, R.D.

3 comments posted

Our government is leading health care reform. I'm not talking about insurance reform but food safety. I'm talking bold changes that will help ensure our health by making our food safer to eat.

In the past 5 years, there have been outbreaks of food-borne illnesses linked to our water supply, spinach, infant formula, pet food, peppers, spinach, peanuts and even cookie dough.

In March 2009, a Food Safety Working Group was formed by the president to make recommendations about modernizing the U.S. food safety system. The group has already launched efforts to improve the safety of our food supply, including:

  • Rules for safer egg handling, refrigeration, storage and transportation to prevent salmonella contamination. These changes are projected to reduce salmonella illnesses by 60 percent and save more than $1 billion dollars.
  • Advice to industry on reducing E. coli contamination in the production and distribution of tomatoes, melons and leafy green vegetables.
  • Establishment of product tracing systems to improve detection and recall of tainted food — from "farm to fork."
  • New standards by the end of this year to reduce the prevalence of salmonella in poultry.
  • Increased testing for E. coli 0157:H7 in raw beef.

In addition, the House has passed and sent to the Senate the Food Safety Enhancement Act of 2009. This legislation would allow the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to increase inspections of food companies from once every 10 years to annually — or even more frequently — for high-risk facilities. It would also empower the FDA to issue mandatory recalls of tainted foods. Currently, FDA does not have this authority.

This is the type of health care reform that provides coverage for everyone. Although everyone may not applaud this "big brother" approach, I'm sure that we all agree that we want safer food.

What are your thoughts?

- Jennifer

3 comments posted

blog index
  • January 1, 2010 3:47 p.m.

    Unhealthy foods have been hospitalising my family for years and I'm determined to ensure my kids eat without fear. car leasing

    - Bobby

  • October 1, 2009 9:27 a.m.

    I think it's way past time to try and get a handle on this situation. A movement back to food that we are not scared to feed our kids would be worth fighting to earn.

    - Eva

  • September 27, 2009 6:09 p.m.

    I take issue with your basic premise that protecting the food supply protects health. This is complete baloney. Protection of health comes from nutrition that must be intrinsic to the food being grown. To get this nutrition it must come from the soil. Industrialized agriculture grows the very low quality food. This plus big brother government inspection does not equal health. The solution is to sell food on the basis of nutrient density. The surprising result is that top quality food is not susceptible to all the toxic problems that industrialized agriculture produces. From the perspective of healthcare Mayo will get a lot more business from people eating low-quality food than from people eating a regular supply of top-quality produce. The best way to get top quality is to grow produce in a fully mineralized soil. See: www.mineralizedgardens.com for more info. Jon

    - Jon

Post a comment

Text Size: smaller largerlarger