Medical Services | Health Information | Appointments | Education and Research | Jobs | About

Connect with an expert

Nutrition-wise

With Mayo Clinic nutritionists Jennifer Nelson, M.S., R.D. and Katherine Zeratsky, R.D.
Back to posting index
March 5, 2008 2:28 p.m.
Multivitamins — Are they the best thing for you?
12 comments posted
Read comments | Post a comment
By Jennifer Nelson, M.S., R.D. and Katherine Zeratsky, R.D.

Do you take a multivitamin? Or a single vitamin, mineral, or combination supplement? If so, you are in the company of tens of millions of U.S. adults.

Why do you take them? Most people say it makes them feel healthier or they believe it will prevent chronic diseases, or colds and flu. But you may be surprised to know that what is in your bottle and on the label is not strictly regulated. And there is no system in place to collect reports of adverse affects.

Over the past few years there has been increasing evidence that multivitamins and single or combination type vitamin/mineral supplements may not provide the health benefit sought by you, the consumer. In some cases the opposite or no beneficial effects have been reported.

Alarming to think that vitamin or mineral supplements could actually cause more harm than good. An example of this is the use of beta carotene by smokers actually increased the incidence of lung cancer. This is echoed by a recent study out of the University of Washington that reports the use of multivitamins, vitamin C, vitamin E and folate did not reduce the risk of lung cancer.

It is not all bad news though; there are studies to support the use of folate (folic acid) prior to and during pregnancy in the prevention of neural tube defects in the developing fetus. And history has proven that vitamins and minerals play a critical role in our health — the reason we know about the benefits of vitamins and minerals in food is because of the major discoveries in disease prevention such as vitamin C and scurvy and thiamine, a B vitamin, and beri beri (a wasting type disease).

This may leave you wondering if those vitamin mineral supplements in your medicine cabinet are doing what they should or even worth your money.

Let's look at this way — do you eat a well balanced diet? If so, you may not need a multivitamin and if you take one as a "safety net" know that you may exceed what your body needs or can use.

Are you concerned about a chronic disease? If so, making changes in your diet and exercise habits, not smoking and following through with recommended screenings by your physician are more likely to benefit your overall health picture.

Consider your current state of health, talk to your doctor and/or dietitian, and weigh the possible benefits and risks of a multivitamin and mineral supplement for you.

To your health,

Katherine

12 comments posted
Read comments | Post a comment
Back to posting index
May 2, 2008 6:13 a.m.
I BELIEVED THAT SOME MULTIVITAMINS ARE VERY EFFECTIVE,BASSED ON YOUR RESEACH, CAN YOU OUTLINE THOSE MULTIVITAMINE THAT ARE EFFECTIVE TO HUMAN HEALTH?.
- GERALD
March 30, 2008 8:58 p.m.
Check out the Landmark Study in Nutrition Journal, an online, peer-reviewed international human nutrition journal. The study, entitled Usage Patterns, Health, and Nutritional Status of Long-Term Multiple Dietary Supplement Users, is the first-ever study on long-term users of multiple dietary supplements, and found these users comparatively to have markedly better health as measured by higher blood levels of key nutrients and more optimal levels of key health biomarkers. This simply confirms that long-term consumers of specific whole food supplements have better health than the two comparison groups—those who used just a multivitamin and those who use no supplements at all. Publication of the Landmark study in Nutrition Journal ensures free and universal access to the manuscript thus enabling immediate communication of these important Landmark study research findings to and from virtually any place in the world. The study will also be indexed in PubMed Central, a free digital archive of biomedical and life sciences journal literature published by the National Library of Medicine and the National Institutes of Health (NIH) ensuring broad based availability of the study manuscript. This publication offers incredible support and enhancement to scientific credibility. If anyone would like a copy, I would be happy to send one. To the best of health, Antoinette
- Toni
March 26, 2008 3:34 p.m.
I don't know why anyone feels the need to cite the beta carotene study regarding smokers.If a person smokes they shouldn't expect any results from supplements because they shouldn't be smoking and talking about health in the same sentence. Nothing good comes from smoking and the havoc it causes to every system of the body. Beta carotene is not bad but in a smokers body it might be- but that's because they smoke!! Most americans are fat, stressed out and unhealthy and could certainly use a multivitamin not to mention a few other supplements.
- karen
March 26, 2008 8:36 a.m.
Seriously, who wants to take another pill or more? Natural forms of vitamins in minerals found in food work much better with one another than taking isolated forms of vitamins and minerals. For good health we all should be eating balanced meals most of the time. That way we do get the right amount of vitamins and minerals that our bodies need. Of course there are specific cases when people who are truly deficient of a certain vitamin and/or mineral with need to use supplements.
- Susie
March 18, 2008 1:53 p.m.
"'You're obviously being paid by the "sickness industry" and not the "wellness industry." -End of Comment'" Wow, Tim. You seem to be a rather unscientific thinker. I for one am glad that people with real expertise on nutrition (dieticians) are willing to put out unbiased, scientifically valid advice like this for us. As for not promoting "wellness," do you not think that citing the evidence that supports the potential harm of supplements is done in the name of promoting wellness? The careful methods of science have done more for human wellness than anything else I can think of.
- Rob
March 14, 2008 8:23 p.m.
I take Vibe, a liquid supplement, for vitamins and antioxidants, and Efacor for Omega3s every day, and I am sure they do improve my overall health.
- Dave
March 12, 2008 10:51 a.m.
I am a 48 year old healthy, normal-weight woman. My doctor recommends taking a multivitamin plus calcium supplements. I find taking these pills leaves a lump in my stomach all day. I do not take vitamins on an empty stomach, but they still bother me. Any suggestions? Can I crush the tablets up before taking them? Can I just drink milk instead of taking the calcium tablets? How much milk do I need?
- Marie
March 11, 2008 8:37 p.m.
You're obviously being paid by the "sickness industry" and not the "wellness industry." -End of Comment
- Tim
March 11, 2008 6:10 p.m.
Perhaps in the medical world the training for supplements is vastly underestimated and therefore you have no formal training in actual supplementation. I happen to know this for a fact because of my association with medical professionals, although I am not one myself. You would also be surprised to know that there is research from Harvard saying every adult needs to be taking at least a multivitamin. You are correct in saying that what vitamins claim to have in them is not "strictly regulated."
- Katie Carter
March 9, 2008 10:34 a.m.
London is beyond the 51st parallel and nobody who eats a reasonable diet here i short of Vitamin D. I'm disappointed that the Mayo Clinic, of all places, isn't a bit more forthright in pointing out how much money is wasted on unnecessary supplements.
- David Colquhoun
Post a comment
COMMENTS PAGE
1 2
Get latest updates via RSS
Latest entries
Learn from the next generation
June 19, 2008 2:14 p.m.
Sugar substitutes stir sweet debate
June 9, 2008 2:32 p.m.

NUTRITION-WISE


Jul 6, 2008